User talk:F-Popz

February 2025

Hello, I'm ScrabbleTiles. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, F-Popz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Hugh Wooldridge did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 11:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your edits again. The Guardian article doesn't mention Wooldridge; Amazon is not a reliable source; and the rest of the information you added was unreferenced. Are you Wooldridge, or do you know him, represent him or work for him? Tacyarg (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]