User talk:ExtandTor/sandbox2

feedback from Elysia

Hey ExtandTor, nice work so far! One thing I would caution against is having too many lists and not enough prose. You can read more about that here. Also, some of your content is unreferenced, particularly your section on the editorial boards. Also, looking at your references, I think you need to give more information. All the reader gets is a URL, an esoteric-sounding name, the website, and the access-date. It's okay to use references that are paywalled (WP:PAYWALL), but you need to give the reader enough information to be able to identify the site. In fact, I'm wondering if it would just cite the works in question rather than citing the url you've given. An easy way to do that is to give the citation button the DOI of the work (when they're journals), and it should be able to autofill in many of the parameters.

I added in a reference section
I fixed the section caps MOS:SECTIONCAPS
I noticed that there is an article for Ferran Sunyer i Balaguer Prize, which you can link to
I noticed you have some bolding on "Lectures on Determinantal Ideals." Generally, titles of works are either in quotations or italicized. For a reference on if you should have quotations, italicization, or neither, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles.
Let me know if you have questions about any of this feedback or of the changes I made! Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Elysia (Wiki Ed): This is extremely helpful. Thanks!! ExtandTor (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]