User talk:Ethanf711

"Food street" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Food street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Food street until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Johor-Singapore special economic zone

Hello, Ethanf711. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Johor-Singapore special economic zone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listing political parties as opposition

Hi there, I noted you listed the various political parties as opposition parties. I believe in keeping a NPOV in stating that they are political parties is sufficient. If you look at People's Action Party and Workers' Party (Singapore), they are introduced as <political stand> political parties etc. Randomly choosing List of political parties in Germany and clicking all the represented parties and then some of the non-represented parties, not a single one is introduced as an ruling or opposition party in the lead.

Basically, regardless of whether are they the ruling, governing, opposition parties, they are political parties set up to try to be the government of the day, and in various parts of their history, they maybe the ruling or opposition party. A lead simplifying saying they are a <political stand> political party in Singapore and whether they are the current ruling, opposition or unrepresented party will be more neutral and focusing on their political stand on their lead sentence. ~ JASWE (talk) 08:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added other description such as the ideology and political spectrum. On most pages, the "opposition" moniker was already there in the title description. I copied the formatting with the word "opposition" from another page for the SPP one, and the "opposition" slipped in there, so I have removed that one. Ethanf711 (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to the "PPP" page, not "SPP". Ethanf711 (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hihi again~! Thanks for the information. I kinda realised that when I went over your edits but decided to just drop a note about my thoughts! Skipping the R in the WP:BRD and thought to discuss it first. New editors would generally like to put the opposition in due to daily influence but you are an experienced editor so I gave my explanation first instead! Thanks! ~ JASWE (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]