User talk:Espenst

Conflict of Interest declaration

I would like to declare a potential conflict of interest regarding the article about *Sturlason AS Polyfoto*. I have a professional interest in the subject, as I have been involved in documenting the company's history and photographs. I created both the Norwegian and English versions of the article to contribute to public knowledge of the company's cultural and photographic legacy. I aim to contribute constructively and transparently, and I welcome input from other editors to ensure the article remains neutral and verifiable. Espenst (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sturlason AS Polyfoto (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't know if more sources are needed – the problem is that the reader doesn't know which information in the draft comes from which source. Please place the "ref" tags after the piece of information supported by the source given in the reference. Here is some more advice on how to do this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sturlason AS Polyfoto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review the draft for Sturlason AS Polyfoto.

I’ve now gone through the article and added inline citations throughout the text, placing <ref> tags directly after each statement supported by a source, in accordance with your feedback.

The sources used are independent and reliable Norwegian publications, including:

Tønsberg Blad (regional newspaper)

Dagens Næringsliv (national business newspaper)

NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation)

Nationen (national daily)

As well as historical works related to the Norwegian resistance.

I understand that most of the sources are in Norwegian, but they are verifiable and appropriate given the subject is a Norwegian company with a nearly 100-year history.

I hope the revised version now meets the requirements for Articles for Creation. I would appreciate any further guidance if needed!

Best regards,

Espenst Espenst (talk) 20:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Espenst! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sturlason AS Polyfoto has been accepted

Sturlason AS Polyfoto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 08:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]