User talk:Emzdeadpool

June 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Devin Haney. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – ².O.^Boxing 22:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leon Edwards, you may be blocked from editing. – ².O.^Boxing 22:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry im learning how to do this Emzdeadpool (talk) 22:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yahya Jammeh. ... discospinster _talk 22:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating another account (Emzdeadpool1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) won't remove the warnings. Read WP:Sockpuppetry. — ².O.^Boxing 22:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Emzdeadpool1 (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ali Eren Demirezen, you may be blocked from editing. Wracking ^talk! 02:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how was it unsourceful, I searched it up Emzdeadpool (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Devin Haney, you may be blocked from editing. Why are you now lying about the tale of the tape? Haney's reach is 72 in. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 22:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I banned Devin Haney's reach is 71 Inches

Every website says 71 inches

this

even Boxrec claims 71 inches

even in his past fights its 71 inches

even bet365 claims his reach is 71 inches

I request my ban be lifted as I have given accurate sources but have been penalised for it. Emzdeadpool (talk) 01:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you unblock me Emzdeadpool (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me Emzdeadpool (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

decline=This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Emzdeadpool (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC) I have been meditating about my actions, I have read the wikipedia policies, I understand my actions have dire consequences and my actions have effect on the life of others, I understand I have done things in the past that are against Wikipedia's polices and I guarantee that in the future it will not occur again, I humbly request my block be lifted and I guarantee I will be useful to the wikipedia community.[reply]

decline=This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Emzdeadpool (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC) I have been meditating about my actions, I have read the wikipedia policies, I understand my actions have dire consequences and my actions have effect on the life of others, I understand I have done things in the past that are against Wikipedia's polices and I guarantee that in the future it will not occur again, I humbly request my block be lifted and I guarantee I will be useful to the wikipedia community.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emzdeadpool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I banned Devin Haney's reach is 71 Inches

Every website says 71 inches

this

even Boxrec claims https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/741718 inches

even in his past fights its 71 inches

even bet365 claims his reach is 71 inches

I request my ban be lifted as I have given accurate sources but have been penalised for it. Emzdeadpool (talk) 01:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] Emzdeadpool (talk) 01:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked, not banned, there is a difference. Your edits have been generally unproductive and you even created another account to attempt to evade scrutiny. You will need to address these issues. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emzdeadpool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Emzdeadpool (talk) 13:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you, and is considerably less convincing than your prior, declined, unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The sites listed by User:Emzdeadpool are nothing but betting sites, and BoxRec is not as reliable as the TV network airing the fight who do their own up-to-date measurements. In this case, DAZN. Furthermore, User:Emzdeadpool should absolutely be indef'ed because of flagrant vandalism like this: [1], [2], [3]. We have enough problems with drive-by stats vandals at WikiProject Boxing as it is—there's no need to let another one roam about. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]