User talk:Ellenshep90
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Ellenshep90, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Leslie Segar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! – NJD-DE (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I am new and do not know how to add source. But the source is from her official website https://www.lesliesegar.com Ellenshep90 (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Leslie Segar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Marijuana (word), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:57, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm new to this
[edit]Sorry I'm new to this but have given an explanation for why I removed it, due to the word having nothing to do with marijuana. It's fully misleading to even include this in the marijuana discussion. Ellenshep90 (talk) 11:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Sorry I'm new to this but have given an explanation for why I removed it, due to the word having nothing to do with marijuana. It's fully misleading to even include this in the marijuana discussion. Ellenshep90 (talk) 11:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Please initiate the discussion at Talk:Marijuana (word). Nobody has (yet) said that you are wrong, just that there has been no agreement that it is wrong. The existing text is well sourced so that needs to be a rational discussion to reach consensus whether the existing text should stay or not. Regards Velella Velella Talk 11:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Leslie Segar for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Segar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.