Jump to content

User talk:Elevator Vending Machine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Elevator Vending Machine, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! QuicoleJR (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template talk:Infobox hospital, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this was a misclick, but you removed other editors' valid talk page posts. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry what ? did you even bother to check what my action was ? the undo that i did is literally to restore the so called "other editors' valid talk page posts." AKA me AKA my post that is titled "Add Department Parameter" which have nothing to do with you or Randwicked back and forth edit war
Also the reason why my revert is ending-up removing his is because when he was editing his post he removed mine in the process so maybe go talk to him about the "misclick" Elevator VendingMachine 11:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No. Your post was properly archived by a bot, per the archiving instructions at the top of the page. Removing others' comments is prohibited. Please do not do it. If you need help unarchiving a post, please ask for help rather than editing disruptively, even by accident.
I expect that your old post will be automatically archived again, since the bot's instructions have not changed. You are welcome to create a new post to see if it attracts any attention this time. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry my bad am confussed then why did i get notification about the other guy edit which show that my post was removed with his post edit to the other conversation Elevator VendingMachine 00:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see your notifications, so I don't know. If you look in the history, however, you can see that your post was archived by the bot and that no human editors removed your post prior to that, as far as I could see. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
np Elevator VendingMachine 10:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2026

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yue🌙 (talk) 03:28, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I was only going to leave a stern warning regarding you calling another editor a monkey and acknowledging that it was a personal attack, but the above discussion on your talk page and these rude comments (e.g. 1 and e.g. 2) indicate this is a reoccurring problem. If you cannot be civil in discussions, then the next block will be permanent because of your behaviour. Yue🌙 (talk) 03:33, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No rush

[edit]

Please be mindful of wp:boomerang. Attacking other editors and bringing them to AIV harms the collaborative environment (at the very least).

I shouldn't say this often because it's implying that someone's focus is not meaningful, but here it is: the definition of extinction / endangered is not that urgent an issue and Wikipedia will be just fine without getting it right for a week, because there is no deadline. There's also many solutions to the ambiguity problem - we can address with footnote or in text that language death is defined differently (see talk section titled "Definition of 'endangered language?'), or simply say "academic consensus differ on the status of H. Ainu, for example..." Or in the category page add "(disputed)" behind the article link, etc..

I'm typing this because I genuinely think you're an editor trying to improve this encyclopedia, and I want to help you with that. I want to help you to make Wikipedia better, and to do that you need to try to stay calm, and sometimes, to not give an eff.

So please, no rush. Have a [insert your favourite drink here], and chill for a second when you see your edits get reverted. Go play videogames for an hour, and oftentimes the revert would seem not so bothersome when you come back.

iris, 1:55p. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 05:55, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]