Jump to content

User talk:ElToAn123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA downgraded to B class?

[edit]

You were kind enough to assess the article Richland Creek (Nashville, Tennessee) and promote it to a GA. Now I notice it has a "B" at the top. Has it been downgraded? Eagledj (talk) 23:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very experienced at assessing pages. The article was reassessed by Tom.Reding, who gave it a B grade. I trust his judgement. ElToAn123 (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, NightWolf1223 was the one who demoted the article from GA to B. I simply removed the stub rating that existed since inception. I've no opinion on its GA status.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  15:17, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. Sorry for the misunderstanding. ElToAn123 (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The reason that I removed the GA assesment is because it never went through a proper GA review. If you do feel like it deserves to be a GA then you can follow the instructions at WP:GAI NightWolf1223 <Howl at meMy hunts> 21:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited METRO Regional Transit Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TransLoc (September 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Transloc-oneline logo blue.svg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Transloc-oneline logo blue.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:14, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SRTA-logo.webp

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SRTA-logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 22:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolf river conservancy logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf river conservancy logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]