User talk:Ed Poor/Naturalistic evolution

Should this article be fleshed out, with the aim of making it stand on its own?

Should it just be merged immediately into evolution or Deistic evolution or creation-evolution controversy? Uncle Ed 16:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How many articles?

Nobody answered my question above, so let me try again. How many different pages do we need, to write about the idea that "evolution" can refer to both unguided evolution and guided or "theistic" evolution?

Maybe naturalistic evolution and unguided evolution could be merged into a single page. Uncle Ed 17:31, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge before redirect

The usual practice at Wikipedia is to merge information from a page before demoting it from an article to a redirect. I see no evidence - either here on the talk page - or even in the edit summary - that the merge has been performed yet. Please merge before redirecting. Uncle Ed 15:11, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's because what was written on this page wasn't information but rather the poorly researched writings of User:Ed_Poor. Nothing was worth saving on the evolution page. Joshuaschroeder 18:54, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(cur) (last) 15:48, 10 November 2005 Ed Poor m (Reverted edits by Joshuaschroeder to last version by Ed Poor)
(cur) (last) 18:52, 9 November 2005 Joshuaschroeder (naturalism generally refers to biology. It doesn't refer to unguided. Please don't mindlessly revert)

I didn't say to save the info on the evolution page but to merge with the unguided evolution page. And didn't you propose as a "point of order" that it would be better to "ask before you remove things"? [1] Uncle Ed 15:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page as you wrote it is uncited, full of errors, and qualifies as original research. It is rightfully removed. Joshuaschroeder 16:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]