User talk:Economics Fraternity

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bada Malhera has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bada Malhera was changed by Economics Fraternity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976111 on 2020-08-06T19:46:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Urbanoc (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at February 14, you may be blocked from editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Sachin Pilot. John^talk 20:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have realized the error of my ways and feel deeply regretful for any angst my actions may have caused amongst the hearts of the sincere editors on Wikipedia.

The reason I had been engaging myself in such torrid affairs is quite unusual. I had been carrying out a logistical experiment on the popularity of different Wikipedia sites and thus took regular notes on when my edits were undone by administrators.

The experiment may have undone the values I have been requested to follow online and I sincerely plead you to restore my editing privileges once again. I shall stop my experiment and start contributing constructively to the betterment of Wikipedia and the benefit of society. Economics Fraternity (talk) 22:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Economics Fraternity (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realized the error of my ways and feel deeply regretful for any angst my actions may have caused amongst the hearts of the sincere editors on Wikipedia. The reason I had been engaging myself in such torrid affairs is quite unusual. I had been carrying out a logistical experiment on the popularity of different Wikipedia sites and thus took regular notes on when my edits were undone by administrators. The experiment may have undone the values I have been requested to follow online and I sincerely plead you to restore my editing privileges once again. I shall stop my experiment and start contributing constructively to the betterment of Wikipedia and the benefit of society.Economics Fraternity (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You'll also need to pick a new username, one that adheres to WP:USERNAME. --Yamla (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= All the edits made using this account have been made by a malicious source trying to imitate me and defame me. Please unblock my IP address to allow me to make a new account through which I will submit the required changes I have already prepared. 13:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Are you claiming this account was compromised? Are you rejecting the path I offered you to being unblocked? --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking IP Address

{{unblock|reason= I just checked the talk page of this account and you will never be able to even imagine the euphooria that engripped me when I saw the message posted by Yamla. How thoughfully and eloquently has this moderator demonstarted the need for banning people from using their wikipedia accounts for harmful purposes.

The truth of the matter though is that I am a high ranking official in charge of coding in Wikipedia to make it a better place for all users. I am quite a high-ranking official and it is turning out to be quite embarrassing when I am not able to make changes to the site I helped design. I had set out to test the efficacy of the Wikipedia moderators and the speed at which they are able to remove harmful content from the site and I am greatly satisfied by the quality of the work being carried out.

Yamla and "ToBeFree", mark the 30th of August on your calendars because a special reward will be presented to you then.

Till then, continue your thoughtful and selfless work while unblocking my IP Address and Account.

Your actions are greatly appreciated. Economics Fraternity (talk) 20:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.