User talk:Eah2beah2b

Welcome!

Hello, Eah2beah2b, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 19:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello Eah2beah2b. You have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. ElKevbo (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eah2beah2b. I have your talk page on my watchlist so I was notified that ElKevbo had posted the above message. I just want to say that I find the message's accusatory tone to be unwarranted given your record of contributions to Wikipedia, and it also says things that probably make no sense to you.

For context, Wikipedia unfortunately has a history of people adding links to their own websites that are not appropriate. Probably 95% of the time, when someone adds a link to their own website it is done in order to promote the website or organization. Your contributions indicate that you're one of the rare people who consistently adds relevant links, in the spirit of contribution to open knowledge rather than using Wikipedia to promote something.

I personally don't see anything wrong with the links you've added, and they seem to mostly have been accepted as positive contributions. Having said that, Wikipedia is a big community and some people would be much more comfortable if instead of adding a link to a video directly to an article, you post an Edit request on the article Talk page. So I would suggest considering that route going forward.

The part of Elkevbo's message that says ...if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. is mumbo-jumbo from one of Wikipedia's boilerplate messages. It is relevant only for people who have created new articles about themselves or the organization they work for, and has no relevance for you as far as I can tell.

Again, thank you for your contributions and I hope you'll stay. Let me know if I can help with anything.

Best wishes, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 04:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm ThadeusOfNazereth. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rosa Ramirez Guerrero without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hello! Your edit replaced the entire page with just your bullet point that you added. In the future, the "Preview Edit" feature before publishing can be a lifesaver (and has saved me a few times too!) ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 15:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irene Roderick (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn’t meet WP:NAUTHOR. Notability is not inherited. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irene Roderick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 00:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eah2beah2b! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 00:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Irene Roderick

Hello, Eah2beah2b. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Irene Roderick".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 01:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]