Jump to content

User talk:Dspl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This appears to be a promotion advert for the company - it lacks any independent verifiable sources to establish its notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Dspl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Datamation Systems (Pvt) Ltd

[edit]

The criteria that the article is assessed against can be found at WP:NCOMPANY. Wikipedia bases its decision about whether an organisation is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organisation or product has attracted significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable secondary sources. That means unrelated to the organisation or product. Using the company's own website as references is not considered to be an independent source of information. Newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable independent sources, as they have editorial oversight, independent of the organisation. You will need to ensure that they are not merely 'mentions in passing', which only establish the organisations existence but not necessarily notability. In addition the article needs to be encyclopaedic, establishing why the organization is notable not as it is currently written which tends to be full of promotional material about the company.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 06:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dspl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Datamation Systems (Pvt) Ltd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 05:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]