User talk:DelphiLore

May 2025

Hello, I'm Koshuri Sultan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Malabar Muslims without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Koshuri ^(グ) 05:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Koshuri Sultan, you were the one who edited the article without any prior discussion or proper context. I reverted your changes because they lacked explanation and didn’t follow consensus. If you're going to call others out, make sure you're holding yourself to the same standard.

If you genuinely want to collaborate, take it to the talk page instead of leaving one sided messages. DelphiLore (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out where is consensus for your edits? So far you have been mainly restoring your edits by misrepresenting others as a vandal or their edits as vandalism. Koshuri ^(グ) 06:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is located here. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not involved. Only notifying you that Koshuri Sultan started a discussion about you linked above. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was started by DelphiLore.[1] I replied because I have ANI on watchlist. Koshuri ^(グ) 06:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Koshuri Sultan Oops, sorry about that. My discussions plugin wrongly attributed you as the author since their wikitext was janky. Parksfan1955 (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Malabar Muslims) for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, calling other editor's edits vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input on Ryan Holiday article

Hello! There's an ongoing discussion about neutrality, tone, and sourcing on the Ryan Holiday article involving editors me and Vegantics. Given your experience with biographies and Wikipedia guidelines, your perspective would be valuable. If you have a moment, please share your thoughts here. Thanks in advance for your help!--IndyNotes (talk) 16:09, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Venniyour revolt

The article Venniyour revolt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find zero in-depth sourcing about this alleged event. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]