User talk:Definer1

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh was changed by Definer1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945277 on 2017-08-14T16:39:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sudhanshu Trivedi.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Sudhanshu Trivedi.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Sudhanshu Trivedi.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Sudhanshu Trivedi.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sudhanshu Trivedi receiving PM Modi.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Sudhanshu Trivedi receiving PM Modi.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sudhanshu Tivedi at Tiranga Yatra.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Sudhanshu Tivedi at Tiranga Yatra.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:With Amit Shah and PM Modi.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:With Amit Shah and PM Modi.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudhanshu Trivedi Profile.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sudhanshu Trivedi Profile.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Dipanker g (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 08:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Definer1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin, I sincerely need your help on this. I was under impression that the previous images I had loaded on Wiki had copyright violations and thus my accounts were blocked. Also I was unclear about the process of appealing etc. Hence loaded my images on flickr.com and linked to the page of Sudhanshu Trivedi by creating a new account. As you can review all the content added by me had no commercial or any other intentions. I am a big fan wikipedia and would like to continue providing my support. Appreciate if you can guide me on this and help by unblocking my account Definer1 (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You must make your request at User talk:Dipanker g (after signing in as that user). Yamla (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Definer1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Dear Admin (Yamla), I was unable to login through the ID Dipanker g, as I do not recollect the password. This was precisely the reason I had created a new ID to add and edit information. My ignorance of the process should not be viewed with any other intentions or sockpuppetry. Would really appreciate if my case is reviewed and considered for unblocking. I will be happy to provide any further informagtion you might need. Thanks again Definer1 (talk) 16:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your original account has an email associated with it; this means you can recover that account's password. However, you'll still need to address the issues Yamla has brought up. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the next unblocking admin, note this user has gone from uploading copyright violations, to now uploading those images taken from other sources, to his/her own flickr account and setting false licensing on those uploads, then uploading the images to Wikipedia with the flickr account as the source. --Yamla (talk) 16:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|Your reason here Dear Admin (Jpgordon), Thanks for your reversion. I tried recovering the password but didn't find an E-mail ID recovery option readily available (my bad). About the points raised by Admin (Yamla), the images other than the news articles belongs to me as was certified. On receiving the notification about the news articles uploaded by me I reloaded them into wikimedia commons giving due reference from the source (Business Standard and Dainik Jagran), which was deleted again. With this change also the images were removed again. Also along with them the other images were removed. Assuming Wikipedia would want an external site (Flickr.com) certify the copyright had uploaded and linked the pictures through Flickr.com. All the efforts taken were to understand how do I upload the content where it rightly belongs at Wikipedia and not to violate or falsify. I stand by that all the images belong to me. Appreciate your help to resolve thisDefiner1 (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)} You're blocked as a sock puppet. Could you comment on this? PhilKnight (talk) 22:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Dear Admin (PhilKnight), thanks for the followup question. As previously mentioned I had created other ID Nimbustrend and Nimbustrend1 as I had forgotten the previously created ID passwords. There are some other IDs also listed as sockpuppet, which I am not aware of? The recently created ID Definer1 was done after my ID Nimbustrend1 got blocked suspecting sockpuppetry. I did not use the IDs concurrently and you can also verify this from your logs. There was no other intention etc regarding these IDs. Request you to review the account block, do let me know if you would require any additional information. Definer1 (talk) 04:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Definer1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin (PhilKnight), thanks for the followup question. As previously mentioned I had created other ID Nimbustrend and Nimbustrend1 as I had forgotten the previously created ID passwords. There was a mention of some other IDs also listed as sockpuppet, I would like to clarify that IDs other than Nimbustrend and Nimbustrend1 were not created my me and I am not aware of the origins for those IDs. I would also like to clarify that the recently created ID Definer1 was done after my previous ID Nimbustrend1 got blocked suspecting sockpuppetry. Also please note that I did not use the listed IDs created by me concurrently and you can also verify this from your logs. My limited knowledge and understanding of the concepts led to the above confusion and I assure you that there was no other intention etc regarding these IDs. Request you to review and remove the account block, going forward will only using one ID (Definer 1) for any edits.You can please keep the other three IDS in blocked state (Dipanker G, Nimbustrend and Nimbustrend1). Do let me know if you would require any additional information Definer1 (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks and no admin has decided to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but if you do so, please rewrite your request. Yamla (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.