User talk:Deepvision

Welcome!

Hello, Deepvision, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fahrenheit Royale 18:24, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. If you continue to paste in material from other sites, you are very likely to be blocked from editing. Ambi 16:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hi, Deepvision. I saw that you created the article Bella Starr today. Unfortunately, I had to delete it because it was a direction copy of page. If you like, you can recreate the page, but it absolutely must contain original text. Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 17:21, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely cannot stress this enough: do not add copyrighted information to Wikipedia. Continuing to do so will result in you being blocked from editing. – ClockworkSoul 17:27, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just a quick note: it's not necessary to sign your articles at the bottom. The article history serves for that purpose. Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 17:54, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. Cheers

Image Tagging Image:180069.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:180069.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Sherool (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Your other images should be taken care of as well. Thanks, Ingoolemo ^talk 00:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown Centrefold July 1970

This article is up on on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I notice you uploaded the cover which may be deleted as well. There is a significant chance that this article may be speedy deleted so you should go and have your say. Capitalistroadster 03:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lucie Theodorova

When creating stubs (a micro-article), please put a notice (see Wikipedia:Stubs) to that effect. It just helps everyone know where work is needed. --대조 | Talk 13:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Dahl

Paris Dahl has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 05:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fair use

A number of the magazine covers you have uploaded and listed as fair use appear not to be. If you can't provide a good fair use rational they are likely to be deleted within 7 days.Genidealingwithfairuse 23:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Corinne_Wahl_1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Corinne_Wahl_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 23:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Suzuki.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Suzuki.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 07:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Bazinjury.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bazinjury.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 07:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boxcovers on articles about pornstars

Just to let you know, boxcovers from movies may only be used on articles that pertain to the movie the boxcover is to. Boxcovers are not meant as a fair usable way to depict the person on the boxcover. Please take a look at Wikipedia's fair use policy for more info! If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Thank you! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 02:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Indec2.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Indec2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 02:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cast20.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cast20.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 02:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Nicole Marciano.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole Marciano.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 14:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Monikakaelin.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Monikakaelin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 20:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:POY 1971.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:POY 1971.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kevin 09:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gina Austin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gina Austin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RMHED (talk) 00:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orchidea Keresztes

The article Orchidea Keresztes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 15:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Orchidea Keresztes

I have nominated Orchidea Keresztes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchidea Keresztes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 17:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicole Marciano

The article Nicole Marciano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tracie Carmichael

The article Tracie Carmichael has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 11:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Gina Austin

I have nominated Gina Austin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Austin (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 10:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lucie Theodorová

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lucie Theodorová, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucie Theodorová. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Deepvision! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 20 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Monika Kaelin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monika Kaelin for deletion

The article Monika Kaelin is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monika Kaelin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 02:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Megan Mason

The article Megan Mason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ENT, WP:PORNBIO, and the GNG. No relevant nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Three years without reliable sourcing for bio information, of which there's virtually none.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikki Anderson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Anderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Anderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]