User talk:David Fuchs/layout

Nice work David! Just one minor nit-pick; the MoS prefers unspaced emdashes (WP:DASH). I know it's not policy, but since we're all about article compliance... ;) EyeSerene^TALK 12:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: also, maybe "...awaiting improvement before final assessment." or something similar? The article may still not pass after a hold. EyeSerene^TALK 12:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've suggested a change to this to use a single status parameter. The reasoning is that we do not want to create a new status "On hold and second opinion", as this adds to the bureaucracy rather than reduces it. Geometry guy 12:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great - added 'hold' as a variant too EyeSerene^TALK 17:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Vandersluis (the operator of StatisticianBot) thinks it shouldn't be too much work to recognise the new template. One question: the old templates take the article name as a parameter and provide a link. Do we want to continue with that, or is it unnecessary? Geometry guy 18:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]