User talk:David.Pete.23

Welcome!

Hi David.Pete.23! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 09:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merapi and Marapi confusion

It is very easy to get confused with Mount Merapi and Marapi - please read very carefully the differences JarrahTree 09:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 09:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation

Hello, David.Pete.23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation

Hello, David.Pete.23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Bryan Mark Rigg

Hello! I undid this edit on Bryan Mark Rigg. This is because the IRICH institute is a known Japanese war crime denial publication with close ties to the 'Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact' and other far right nationalist publications which are unreliable propaganda publications that downplay, deny, or justify Japanese war crimes. They themselves openly state their mission is:

The aim of our institute was stipulated as “this incorporated association aims to protect the honor and dignity of Japan and the Japanese people through international controversies over historical issues” in Article 3 of our Agreement. The new version of Article 3 of our “Statute” states: “This incorporated association aims mainly to conduct historical research, publish results and disseminate the correct understanding of Japan both domestically and internationally.” Words have changed, but our mission to challenge international controversies, including our activities related to the United Nations, which unfortunately have been insufficient so far, is the same as ever.

https://www.sdh-fact.com/opinion-article/1935/

In that same statement they support Ramseyer's infamous publication and downplay comfort women. I just wanted to bring this to your attention. Relm (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]