User talk:Creativitywiki
Images
[edit]Hi, all the images you uploaded are nominated for deletion for missing sources. Hekerui (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Creativitywiki. Thank you for your work on Raphael E. Cuomo. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Creativitywiki
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Raphael E. Cuomo, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 13:55, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Klbrain:
- Thanks Klbrain for this comment. The subject of this article is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert, particularily in cancer prevention. This includes major national and international outlets. Below is a list of examples. This would meet criterion #7 of WP:NPROF. An overzealous editor previously removed the media coverage section which I originally included on the page, and other editors subsequently had expanded. I've now reverted that removal since it is relevant for this subject.
- Daily Mirror: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/professor-says-up-50-cancer-34934117
- Gloucester Live: https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/health/one-most-powerful-cancer-risk-10056042
- Sacramento Bee: https://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/living/wellness/article301115259.html
- New Telegraph: https://newtelegraphng.com/study-links-lack-of-sunlight-vitamin-d-to-colon-cancer-risk/
- SciTech: https://scitechdaily.com/lower-exposure-to-uvb-light-from-the-sun-may-increase-colorectal-cancer-risk/
- CNET: https://www.cnet.com/health/nutrition/pepsi-poppi-healthy-soda-experts-weigh-in/
- Women's Health: https://www.womenshealthmag.com/beauty/a64188169/is-antiperspirant-bad-for-you/
- Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/vaping-warning-e-cigarettes-health-problems-1865361#:~:text=Vaping%20is%20often%20considered%20to,within%20six%20hours%20of%20vaping.
- NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/i-really-love-vibes-how-yelp-boosts-black-market-pot-n1132586
- wikicreativity (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- That's a big set of churnalism where Cuomo isn't the primary topic; notice the similar dates and similar content. I don't think that that's enough. Klbrain (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Raphael E. Cuomo
[edit]Hello Creativitywiki, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Raphael E. Cuomo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael E. Cuomo.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Sarah Kliff for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kliff (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.