User talk:Cpcv2026

Purged and Embargoed Cross-Validation

I have written my first article here Draft:Purged Cross-Validation.

Please be kind and help me improve it.

Much appreciated! Cpcv2026 (talk) 13:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purged cross-validation (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeWake was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references are not properly linked and some don't even exist (for example, ref [8]), this makes me suspcious that some, if not all, of the article content may be LLM generated. Please fix the references to the link to the articles. Without appropriate sourcing from reliable publications, the topic cannot be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Purged cross-validation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeWake (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cpcv2026! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeWake (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @WeWake for your helpful comments. I have cleaned up the references, as you requested. This time I have added links to the references, so that readers can follow up without having to google them. I am new to Wikipedia, and I appreciate your patience with me! (Cpcv2026 (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purged cross-validation has been accepted

Purged cross-validation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pedantical (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Pedantical. I am convinced that this article will be very helpful to students like me. Cpcv2026 (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]