Jump to content

User talk:Copy Editor/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copy Editor talk page archive


Your edit

[edit]

Your edit here removed something to round out criticism similar to it. I won't put it back, but I'm just letting you know that it was in the criticism section for a reason. Thanks. Wikibout-Talk to me! 15:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shakirafatparody.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shakirafatparody.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Marymaninmorrisseyhousebullmountain.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marymaninmorrisseyhousebullmountain.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Joestarkstapelarge.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joestarkstapelarge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oprahandgail.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oprahandgail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Marymorrisseyonwillametteweek.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marymorrisseyonwillametteweek.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Shakirafatparody.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shakirafatparody.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Joestarkstapelarge.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joestarkstapelarge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ritaallenboggss.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ritaallenboggss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Willametteweeksmarymorrissey.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Willametteweeksmarymorrissey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Whattheworldnowneeds.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Whattheworldnowneeds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MER-C 11:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Campazul.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Campazul.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mmmwithdalailama.jpg

[edit]

I have tagged Image:Mmmwithdalailama.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Azul

[edit]

I left a message for you at Image talk:Campazul.jpg. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Marymaninboggsearlycandid.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marymaninboggsearlycandid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Addhoc 10:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)orphaned fair use image as of 2007-06-18 (CSD I5)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Joepstark.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joepstark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Marymorrisseyonwillametteweek.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marymorrisseyonwillametteweek.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Living_Enrichment_Center_last_service_at_Valley_Theatre,_Beaverton,_Oregon.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Living_Enrichment_Center_last_service_at_Valley_Theatre,_Beaverton,_Oregon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit summaries

[edit]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:


Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. —EncMstr 20:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anaïs Nin

[edit]

I tagged the fair-use image Image:Anaisnin.jpg for deletion because we now have free images to replace it. Rl (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anaisnin.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anaisnin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Mayor bud clark nutcracker 1985.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 18:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Baristas first starbucks.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Baristas first starbucks.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Tribute to greg sage.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tribute to greg sage.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tribute to greg sage.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tribute to greg sage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Colegio cesar chavez dollar.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Colegio cesar chavez dollar.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Colegio cesar chavez dollar2.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Colegio cesar chavez dollar2.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MMP (Oregon street gang) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ubelowme U Me 15:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MMP (Oregon street gang) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMP (Oregon street gang) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMP (Oregon street gang) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ubelowme U Me 17:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is a discussion regarding merging Mary Manin Morrissey into Living Enrichment Center. Your opinion would be welcome. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:48, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Electronic business magazine article.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Electronic business magazine article.jpg, which you've attributed to Electronic Magazine article. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Environment oregon office portland oregon - Copy.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Environment oregon office portland oregon - Copy.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Neighborhood-watch zimmerman.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neighborhood-watch zimmerman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 00:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to George Zimmerman, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 00:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add "defamatory" information to the George Zimmerman article. I added factually accurate and notable information to that article, based on reliable sources. [1] Copy Editor (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]
NOTE -- Below, another editor inaccurately refers to "poorly sourced" material. They are referring to the fact that I inserted a link to a USA Today article, and therefore they are inaccurately referring to my edits. USA Today is a reliable source, and this is the link I had inserted, a link that has already been included in other Wikipedia articles on this subject: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/NEWS/usaedition/2012-04-12-trayvon-cover-timeline_ST_U.htm

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Trayvon Martin. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VQuakr (talk) 04:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.[reply]

George Zimmerman was told by a 911 operator not to follow Trayvon Martin. This fact is reported in many notable and reliable sources, such as USA Today, to name just one: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/NEWS/usaedition/2012-04-12-trayvon-cover-timeline_ST_U.htm This fact is already referenced in the article Shooting of Trayvon Martin. Including this historically accurate information, as backed up with a reliable and notable source, into the Trayvon Martin article (a person who, having been killed by [[George Zimmerman, is no longer a "Living Person"), hardly constitutes "liable" and is hardly "inflammatory." Though it does meet the ire of people who support the "Not Guilty" verdict that George Zimmerman received (a verdict that outraged a significant portion of the population, disgusted much of the civilized world, and even elicited an unprecedented commentary by the president of the nation from the White House). Thank you. Copy Editor (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]

The person who left the message above (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VQuakr), as well as the message from the previous month, are both people who support the "Not Guilty" verdict that George Zimmerman received when he was acquitted of the murder of Trayvon Martin. They are two editors who have attempted for about two months now to remove anything from the George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin pages that look negative about Zimmerman, no matter how well-cited such references are. Copy Editor (talk) 22:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that depends on your definition of "support." If you mean that I think we should comply with WP:BLP, then yes, I support it. I had assumed you already were aware that WP:BLP applies to all living persons on all articles, not just the biographical article of that person. If I was mistaken, then please consider yourself notified that this is indeed the case. VQuakr (talk) 22:23, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You support the "Not Guilty" verdict that George Zimmerman received, and you are policing his biography page and under the guise of complying to Biographies of Living People standards you are trying to keep out of the article any information regarding that man's sole claim to notability: the fact that he killed an unarmed child who had committed no crime. Copy Editor (talk) 19:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More than one account

[edit]

Andrew Parodi Please stick with using one account and not multiple ones like the Copy Editor account. Please read up on using more than one account. Thanks! Valfontis (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]