User talk:Codonified

Happy New Year!

Codonified,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Nyxion³⁰³💬 Talk 10:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks a lot😀❤️ Codonified (talk) 13:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for being silly enough to ask to be trouted 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

And for not, so far as I can tell, initiating the necessary sockpuppetry investigations you mentioned on my talk page 😈🤡😇 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Uhm, so sigma that i skibidi 🗣️🗣️🗣️ Codonified (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Er, yes 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parambassis baculis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pool. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

🤖 Codonified (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Specific names

Hi, from the discussion on my request to delete Barilius pectoralis I have an inkling that some clarification on how species names work might be helpful. I did not know this until I started editing articles on Wikipedia and anither editor explianed this to me. I may be completely wrong about that but anyway.....

A species is described by a biologist, Anders Andersen, and it is assigned it to a genus, say Johnius smithius A. Andersen, 2025, another biologist, Bertrand Beauchamps, studies this species and finds that it should be in a different genus, Jamesius, so the species name is changed to Jamesius smithius (A. Andersen, 2025). The species is still the same, it is the same name smithius and relies on the validity of the original species description. The name of the author in parentheses indicates that the genus has been changed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you bro, you are very kind.

I really appreciate you taking your time to teach me.

:D

Codonified (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2025 (UTC)