User talk:Climate+Tech AI Think-tank

March 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Climate+Tech AI Think-tank", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because It appears to represent an organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bürokratiemonster (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tenshi Hinanawi was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bürokratiemonster and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:43, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenshi Hinanawi Thank you for the time reviewing the page.

I am struggeling to see which of your bullet-points apply, I personally find the text short, concise, the sources are all stated and I don't see speculative or exaggerated arguments.

If you would please be so kind to elaborate a little bit what caught your eye, we are more than happy to fis that.

Best

Chris Climate+Tech AI Think-tank (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See response here Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Climate+Tech AI Think-tank! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:43, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]