User talk:Ckptran/sandbox
Hey Christine! Great job with your article on genital ulcers. Going through your article, you seemed to have found numerous sources that you were able to pull into your article and really elaborate on the various causes of ulcers. Starting with the heading of your article, I thought you did a good job making the initial sentence succinct and to the point. It gives the reader a good idea of what they are about to jump into with the rest of the article. With regard to the organization of the remainder of the article, I liked how you separated out the sub-headings (i.e., STI vs. non-infectious vs. non-STI infectious causes).
My particular favorite part of the article was the table you made that differentiated the various causes of STI genital ulcers. One possible thing to consider could be elaborating a little further on the treatment section of the table. Maybe consider adding the actual anti-viral and anti-bacterial drugs used in the treatment of these conditions.
In terms of organization of your article, maybe one way you could improve on the clarity is to find a way to break up the paragraphs into more bite-sized chunks. With us having medical backgrounds, it may be easy for us to read those blocks of texts since that's what we are used to in our training. For the layperson, however, it may be helpful to break down the paragraphs into smaller chunks so its easier to understand.
From a neutrality perspective, I think you did a great job reporting just the facts. Your references also appear to be appropriate and from well-respected sources.
Finally, one more minor point that may make a big difference is to include images. I'm not sure how easy it may be to find open-sourced images of ulcers, but that is a small addition that could really add to your article.
Keep up the good work!