User talk:Chip3004/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Hi Chip3004! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fuzheado | Talk 16:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Important thing regarding the royal rumble 2021 promotional Poster image you uploaded

@Hawk764: I want to bring this to your attention but when you uploaded the image did you forget add a copyright tag, and the following Where did this image come from?, Who created it?, Who holds the copyright to this image? the answer all three questions is this The image came from wwe, wwe created the image and wwe holds the copyright to that image. Unless this information is added to the image page, the image will be deleted after 27 January 2021. Chip3004 (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Talk page archive

If you need help setting up a talk page archive then feel free to ping me. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC) (please  mention me on reply; thanks!)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I saw you had some trouble with setting up your talk page archive. I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page, by setting the correct |archive= parameter. I also changed the time to 30 days, that should probably be fast enough. --rchard2scout (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Survivor Series 2006

You don't need to add match stipulations like you did at Survivor Series (2006). There is a link to Last Chance match to look at. TPalkovitzTPalkovitz (talk) 04:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Royal Rumble page

It looks to me like the person using an IP address is edit warring. It is quite late tonight, but tomorrow I will write up a report and file it on the admin board if that is OK. Kurisumasen (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Excellent Idea, Go ahead and do that, The IP has received it's first warning Chip3004 (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

The IP is in the right here. They did nothing wrong except say something right. I am a pro wrestling fan. I know for sure that the IP is getting attacked with an abuse of power! Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2021 (EST)

I don't think so, it is still edit warring by ip, The ip is still wrong except for one part, Kane is a free agent too soo it needs to be HOF/Free Agent because Kane is not assigned to any brand. Chip3004 (talk) 03:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Then why is Torrie Wilson a HOF? And also, if they are still in the wrong, why don't you just change it to HOF/Free Agent and make the color the HOF color and call it a day? Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 12:06, 15 July 2021 (EST)

Based on recent actions, it seems likely that they would revert any edit to the status at the moment. The discussion we’re having here is the discussion I would have loved to have had with them, but they refuse to engage beyond abuse in the comments. I hope we can come to some sort of compromise, and perhaps that is what the admins will recommend. But edit warring is not allowed regardless of right or wrong! (And we still disagree on what is right.) Kurisumasen (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

I've managed to speak to the IP about your recent changes. He says he is fine with it. So he would be glad that all this stuff ends. Thank you. Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 5:34PM 15 July 2021 (EST)

Reporting User who vandalised my talk page

Thanks for helping me out 👍
Kpddg (talk) 15:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Incident discussion

If you have the time, please head back to Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents and make an attempt to add the requested diffs so that your request can be evaluated. If you need further help after reading the guides, just let me know. Jehochman ^Talk 15:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

New message from InternetScavenger89

Hello, Chip3004. You have new messages at InternetScavenger89's talk page.
Message added 21:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for the feedback on the edit war earlier today. It means a lot. --InternetScavenger89 21:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Excessive bolding

Please stop with the unnecessary excessive bolding on those NTT pages thank you, Edgar Searle (talk) 03:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Will Healy (composer). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Rangeblock

I took care of it. Daniel Case (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Recently deleted content

You deleted more than just external links on the Stephen Pearcy (Activist) page. You also deleted relevant language. The links that you call inappropriate were originally added as citation sources. Citations serve a fundamental purpose throughout Wikipedia. Noe of those links were placed there to promote anything. They were citation source links that substantiated statements of fact in the article. You deleted those statements of fact along with the links. I agree that some links are no longer valid, but they were valid when the factual statements were made, and those links supported the statements. I can perhaps understand if you think deleting the invalid links serves a purpose here, but deleting those doesn't justify deleting the factual statements as well.2600:1700:7BE4:C800:F914:256B:308B:B166 (talk) 00:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Anonymous editing

Hi, I noticed you took care of the edit wars between the two idiot anonymous editors. Thanks for doing that. It was very irritating, and I saw they were doing it across a few topics. I have no interest in anime, so I'll leave that for you to watch, but I can take care of the baseball pages if there's any more nonsense there. Thank you again. Back Bay Barry (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Baseball stadiums

I noticed you reported one of the IP addresses that was making reverts to the 3 baseball stadium pages, but not the other IP addresses. I also noticed you made the same edits to those articles that the IP addresses made that you DIDN'T report. Can you report those other ones and stop changing the pages please? Thank you. Back Bay Barry (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Never mind

I hope you don't mind, I basically copy-pasted what you did to report the other IPs and it looks like an administrator took care of it. Thank you for the help. Back Bay Barry (talk) 19:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

im sorry

im sorry chip3004 for changing the charlie cox page it wont happen again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgbatty (talk • contribs) 22:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Movies

Adam Sandler is in Pearl Jam 20 I bet you if you go Adam Sandler 2011 movies in Google pearl jam 20 comes up and it even says it in IMDb 49.197.125.85 (talk) 01:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Big E

Hey! I reverted the edit on Big E, per MOS:SURNAME. Just wanted to let you know! ɯɐɔ 💬 04:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Thisisnotcam: I want to bring this to your attention that Per WWE Site Lists Big E as a Raw Superstar and not an Smackdown Superstar, I am including the link

https://www.wwe.com/superstars/big-e

Chip3004 (talk) 04:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! @Chip3004. The edit I reverted was regarding using his legal last name vs. his stage/nick name. But this is helpful, because I know there are pending changes, I'm a pending changes reviewer, and I don't know much about WWE. So thank you! ɯɐɔ 💬 04:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

AHHhh I see what happened now; the rollbacker picked up your SD/raw edit, not the last name. So sorry! ɯɐɔ 💬 04:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Yet another pro zionist anti-western troll

That is what you are.

MeidasTouch thread protection

Hey if heroicSSD shows up to remove it again should the article be put under semi protected or not since he is going to do it over and over again? Persesus (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Chip3004, I don't know why you keep doing but I'm just wanted to tell you to stop. If you don't you will be in danger of being blocked! 2.137.140.173 (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Jimmy Buffett

Shouldn't that be "Cheeseburger in Paradise"? It's currently missing an 'a': "Cheeseburger in Pardise" Cheers Adakiko (talk) 03:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know that Cheeseburger in Pardise was missing an "a". My edit has now been corrected. Chip3004 (talk) 03:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Revert at Melissa Lucio

Greetings, Chip3004. Re: [1]

• We're thankful that you appear to be patrolling for vandalism here at a biography of a living person, Chip3004, but we're curious to know why you labeled the above edit unequivocally as malicious? I capitalized Lucio's surname & I changed the "citizenship" field from "Texas Resident" to "United States".
• does your negative judgement pertain to our status as pseudonymous editors, Chip3004, and did you automatically react rapidly to the edit tag indicating a "possible BLP issue?" 2600:8800:1B00:CE:20F3:D099:AAED:FF44 (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

The problem with that is you have to provide an Reliable Source. the "BLP problem" is defined as the presence of unsourced, poorly sourced, and contentious content in biographies of living people. In case of your edit, it was unsourced, In a BLP Article you always have to provide an reliable source, otherwise the edit would be challenged and removed. Chip3004 (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

BKFIP

He yo mate. I'm a bit late to the party. Just wanted to let you know that in case of BKFIP is suspected I suggest requesting a proper investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Best known for IP (e.g. [Apr 26, 2022, 21:04]). Thanks for heads up and filling WP:ANI complaint anyway. All the best. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 02:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Why are you replying to complaints at WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism? I looked you up at Wikipedia:List of administrators, and I don't see your name there. Nythar (talk) 03:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Update on an edit war

Wanted to let you know that after you warned User:Tintor2 for edit warring on the Red-Haired Shanks article, they almost immediately proposed it as an article for deletion instead of initiating discussion on the talk page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red-Haired_Shanks. --Plumber (talk) 20:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

My mistake, Tintor2 was not the one who proposed the article for deletion. Sorry for the inconvenience there. --Plumber (talk) 23:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Truth

I'm not trying to harass anyone Chip I'm trying to fix incorrect errors but MrOllie keep putting those errors back causing a virus. 2600:387:15:633:0:0:0:7 (talk) 02:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Harassment by 140.213.146.240

Hi Chip3004! I wanted to leave you a message here to let you know that I've blocked this user for 72 hours, and have redacted their disruptive edits to your user talk page. If any more harassment or disruption like this continues to occur, please let me know and I'll be happy to put a stop to it. :-)

More importantly, I wanted to informally talk to you about how to properly respond to this kind of disruption should it happen in the future. I noticed that your edit summaries and responses to this user's harassment and disruption were also not civil in return. Now, please don't get me wrong - I completely understand how frustrating that this kind of trolling can be, and I absolutely understand the temptation that users feel to respond to this kind of trolling with the same kind of incivility, personal attacks, use of profane language, etc in return. However, you need to know it's not the right thing to do. Two wrongs do not make a right, and you need to be the bigger person in these situations, and brush it off and let users like myself handle the situation.

That aside, I'll also share with you some important information that my 15+ years of experience with contributing to Wikipedia and handling these exact kinds of users has concluded. Responding to disruption and trolling in the manner that you did yields absolutely no positive benefit whatsoever. It only wastes your time, and encourages the user to keep up exactly what they're doing because your uncivil responses are showing the user that their harassment is working! Remember: users who engage in this kind of behavior do so with the desire and the intent to provoke that exact kind of response from you, and by being uncivil and telling them off like that, you're giving them exactly what they want. In situations like this, it's important that you remember the rule that I'm sure you've heard many times before: do not feed the trolls.

Think of this with the analogy of the annoying older brother repeatedly jabbing or poking his little brother. The older brother keeps doing that to his little brother, because each time that he does so, his little brother screams back at him to "stop poking me!" Then the little brother learns the master trick to get his older brother to actually stop doing this: Just ignore it and don't give the behavior that kind of negative attention. The little brother does exactly this, and do you know what happens? The older brother becomes bored with what he's doing, and he moves on to do something else. By not giving the trolls what they want, you starve them of their "food", and you make them become bored with what they're doing and move on to doing something elsewhere.

These are the reasons that you should always avoid responding to this kind of trolling with backlash in return. Anyways, I just wanted to message you about this in order to talk to you, and encourage you to reconsider how you respond to this in the future. Keeping civil and kind toward all other editors, including the trolls and the bad-faith ones, will only make you a more mature and bigger person who is more-composed and happier than the user on the other side of the glass. Plus, it tires them out and send them elsewhere to try and get attention. :-)

If you have any questions or would like to talk to me about this further, please don't be a stranger! My user talk page is always open to you, and you are welcome to message me at any time. I hope you have a great day, I hope that you take this message to heart, and I wish you happy editing. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:F5BD

Never Mind I removed that message