User talk:KLIFE88

Your revert edit summary

"Vandalism"

You don't seem to understand what vandalism actually is on Wikipedia. Content disputes are not vandalism, and it's also not something that another editor does that you disagree with. Please read and understand WP:VANDALISM first. Thanks! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is vandalism when you delete content because you saw another account deleting them, you disagree on information provided with sources then start a talk other then deleting info that people worked hard gathering, especially when those info are backed up by official sites. KLIFE88 (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if you don't understand WP:VANDALISM then refrain from throwing the term around. Thanks for your understanding! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And please start conversation and discussion of huge decision other then deleting big information. Thank you for your cooperation! KLIFE88 (talk) 23:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Best of Big Bang 2006-2014.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Big Bang 2006-2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Übermensch World Tour. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I warned you about misusing the term "vandalism" three years ago yet you still don't understand what you are doing wrong. The next time you make disruptive edits, such as persistently restoring your edits that contain grammar mistakes over and over again, you will be reported. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence was changed and was grammatically correct, but you didn't notice it since you were busy deleting, next time you can change the sentence if you don't it, and better is to improve it instead of unnecessary full erasing. And please as well next time don't use weak articles as 'critical reviews' with their content source is X random accounts that spread hate and not at all critical reviews. We here to improve the article and fixing, and of course deleting good info isn't a part of that. KLIFE88 (talk) 01:37, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]