User talk:CepheusCetus

Peer Review

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I completed the peer review on your article. Pseudacris Regilla (talk) 18:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

LSD & Steve Jobs

@AndresjFlores I was looking at your article (got there from new page review) and I'm not sure it needs to be its own article. The main Steve Jobs article already talks about his LSD usage somewhat, and although more info could be added, I'm not really sure it needs to be covered separately from most discussion of him -- it also loses context. Maybe an article on the impact of LSD on silicon valley would be better? Mrfoogles (talk) 00:49, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

@Mrfoogles This is for a class, so it is my first time writing editing on Wikipedia. I did realize as I was writing it that it wasn't significant enough to make its own article. But due to deadlines I couldn't make that big of a significant change. So I just stuck with what I had. I do plan on make a change like you mention later on. You did help me decide on the title though, so thank you. :) AndresjFlores (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

K, I'll leave you to it then. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Impact of LSD on Steve Jobs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Impact of LSD on Steve Jobs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources that describe the subject in detail. See WP:42 for an (over)simplified summary of the problem. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC)