User talk:Cathasaigh23
Hi. Your edits aren't being reverted by bots, they're being reverted by people, including me. If you go to the article history, you'll see that there are explanations being provided for why your edits are being reverted/modified. Chief among them is that it is not a requirement that sources on Wikipedia be scholarly in nature. It's fair enough to want to modify the language to be less declaratory if the sources are also circumspect, but straightforward removal of sourced content requires some reasoning beyond "the source isn't scholarly". There should be concrete reasons to doubt the reliability of the source. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. I will review the policy regarding not needing to cite scholarly statements before making any further changes. Please notate this on the Talk page so that others can avoid the same mistake and instead focus their efforts on specifying that the information given is dubious. Cathasaigh23 (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)