User talk:CarpenterAnt/Knowledge graph

Since your sandbox was empty, I chose to give your bibliography a peer review.

I enjoyed how you broke up the sections, and I used it for my own bibliography and article. I read the main article and your recommendations for improvement, and they seem reasonable (well done!). Take the word "EDITS" off of the header "Using a knowledge graph for reasoning over data (EDITS)". I advise you to proofread the article's grammar. Take out the "Edits" from the "Introductory Edits," and your citation link does not work. Be sure you completed it correctly. It's excellent and a great indication that you can contribute to improving the main article because you used updated articles from 2023.

Peer Review

Hi, I didn't find what you have edited but I have comment on the overall articles. The peer review has left. I am looking forward to read more in the future. SummerNightmare2023 (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hi CarpenterAnt!

I've left a review on your draft in your bibliography.

Let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to seeing your final draft!

Waveformleaf (talk) 15:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More Information Can be added.

Hi, I believe there are too many things related to Knowledge graphs that can add value to your article, Some of them could be-

You can provide details about the data types used to generate knowledge graphs. This can include rdfs.

You can mention about the different platforms that allow users to build and explore knowledge graphs. For example- GraphDB, AWS Neptune

Blackshadow005 (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]