User talk:CaroTommo123
June 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alex O'Loughlin because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Technopat (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Dransfield. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Michael Dransfield was changed by CaroTommo123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-06-11T21:04:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Abdullah Gul Interchange with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 21:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Commission on Scottish Devolution, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Technopat (talk) 21:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)