User talk:Caiusjacob28

Short descriptions

Have a read of Wikipedia:Short description if you're here to edit short descriptions. Some articles (like List of creepypastas) don't need them. In other cases (like Multiple-vortex tornado) the short descriptions should be "very brief", rather than expanded with additional details: More than 80% of short descriptions use fewer than 40 characters (including spaces). Belbury (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

(edit conflict) Hi Caiusjacob28
You have edited several Short descriptions, but I have had to undo some of your edits as short descriptions should be 40 characters (including spaces) or fewer see WP:SD40. Furthermore, when a short description is sufficiently self explanatory, as in "list of ...", "none" is the correct short description - please see WP:SDNONE - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would say this is also unnecessary. Mellk (talk) 07:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emilio Aguinaldo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I note you've been advised several times that short descriptions should be short, but you've just extended the short description at Emilio Aguinaldo well beyond the recommended limit. It is disruptive to continue a series of edits after being advised against them or to edit against community consensus. DrKay (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm ClaudineChionh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evolution of the Philippine Flag have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 11:45, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding excessive detail to short descriptions

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. Belbury (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]