User talk:CPSisoAisha

Welcome

Hello CPSisoAisha and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Christian views on slavery, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christian abolitionism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at History of the Jews under Muslim rule, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

speaking of citing sources, some lady's opinion with no facts is pretty weak. Please let me know what was false about what I wrote. Let's compare sources. Sorry you hate the religion that cause you to be literate. CPSisoAisha (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

You have to obey the WP:RULES, like anyone else. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

dont worry, I'm figuring it out. Ill get it. And youll get real sources. Not liberals who wrote a book 2 years ago and none of their sources CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

You do not dictate our WP:RULES, you just have to obey our rules. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Dont worry. I'll get better at adding html. And you'll get real, credible sources. Not opinions that happen to be in a book, liberal. CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:CPSisoAisha that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian views on slavery. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. See WP:CIRCULAR. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Islamic views on slavery, you may be blocked from editing. ElENdElA (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Please reference the falsehood I added. And we can discuss whether it is true or false, and whether it's relevant. Personally, I think the quran is relevant to islam. CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Islamic views on slavery. ElENdElA (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

please reference what was false. CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

you should read the source. It says the slave owner has sexual rights. Also the quran is a much better source CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Coward CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This would be a good youtube video. Absolutely true facys being removed from wiki by sharia loving liberal who want islam to enslave them. CPSisoAisha (talk) 14:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes or No. Are you doing this because I said something that is not true? If yes, defend yourself. If no, there's no defense. CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

So in other words, you refuse to say what was false about what I wrote? And me accusing people of hiding the truth of having a liberal agenda is grounds for blocking me? Interesting CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Who hide the truth* CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:THETRUTH. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

your response is a joke. Literally CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

— Oscar Wilde

Quoted by tgeorgescu (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Good job not telling me I was wrong about 1 single thing. You're reall stroking my ego 😂 CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

(Redacted) CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Sidenote, as a blocked user, your talk page is meant to be used for requesting an unblock. There's a chance your talk page access will be revoked if you do not meaningfully engage with the circumstances leading to your block. 〜 Askarion ✉ 19:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

tell me I was incorrect about 1 single thing I wrote. That's my challenge. CPSisoAisha (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Judaism and Christianity traditionally saw nothing wrong with Muhammad's marriage. 20th and 21st century secularists did. For 1000 years major religions had no problem with that.

The worst enemies of banning child marriages are US evangelicals. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

source? CPSisoAisha (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Whether or not what you wrote was the cold hard undeniable truth, your combative attitude towards other editors who disagree with you is not conducive to building an encyclopedia. If you mean to make an unblock request, I suggest you address that and lay out how you intend to act differently. If you can't, I expect your TPA will be revoked very very soon. 〜 Askarion ✉ 19:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I was unaware that Wikipedia only accepts cold hard undeniable facts from people who are kind to liars. Is that in the terms and conditions? CPSisoAisha (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)