User talk:Blued20

March 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ik Onkar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Blued20, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! — SamX [talk · contribs] 06:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Zorawar Singh (Dogra general). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 06:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Randeep Maddoke

Hello Blued20, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Randeep Maddoke, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned of similar behaviour in the past by an admin, please refrain from any further POV pushing. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 04:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Parag Jain, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pasados (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you want to disinform Wikipedia users about Parag Jain. Do not issue me these vague warnings. Please talk to me on the talk page of the article where everyone can keep track of what you are trying to do. Blued20 (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pasados. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Parag Jain, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Pasados (talk) 16:43, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop issuing me fake notifications, this is just intimidation. You seem to have a pro-Indian bias, and want to stop information flow on Parag Jain from reaching Wikipedia users. Your edits on the article are disingenuous and you are abusing your position. All of the Indian media article also fall under unreliable sources, but you didn't issue any warning to those users but only to me. Blued20 (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Parag Jain article unverified claims

Hello sir, why are you not participating in the discussion constructively. Umar Choudhary8 (talk) 14:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I remove those details Umar Choudhary8 (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello why aren't you responding. Umar Choudhary8 (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I m removing as you are not responding or contributing to talk.

This shows your biasness Umar Choudhary8 (talk) 18:19, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Parag Jain. It's vandalism, so don't revert it again. The topic was discussed one month ago by you with another editor. If you still want to make the same changes,before that please have a discussion with the editor on the article talk page with reliable sources, but without WP:OWNBEHAVIOR Pasados (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So the other person vandalized Wikipedia and you issue me a warning? I responded to every point of the user. He just goes ahead and deletes my references, and a whole section of Criticisms and instead of reverting to my version, you revert to his version? How is that fair? Blued20 (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note that as per the 500/30 restriction on Indian military history noted above, you should refrain from making edits relating to Operation Sindoor, such as those you have been in dispute over at Parag Jain, until you have reached WP:XC status. You may also find the advice at WP:ECREXPLAIN helpful. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:31, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to have been a misunderstanding, I have never edited anything related to Operation Sindoor, and have neither mentioned it in any of the edits. Blued20 (talk) 10:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]