User talk:Blogman111

Welcome!

Hello, Blogman111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Julian Castro. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! – Muboshgu (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Blogman111, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Julian Castro seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for disruptive editing of Socialism and Democratic socialism

Hello, I'm Koala Tea Of Mercy. I noticed that you made a change to the articles for Socialism and Democratic socialism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edits to at Socialism and Democratic socialism seemed less than neutral and have been removed for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Socialism and Democratic socialism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the pages for Socialism and Democratic socialism has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to at Socialism and Democratic socialism, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 06:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marking all edits as minor

It appears you mark all of your edits as "minor", even those that make substantial changes to content. The "minor" indicator should be reserved for edits such as grammar, spelling, etc. that do not affect content or meaning. Please see Help:Minor_edit for more details. I just noticed that another editor pointed this out to you some time ago; perhaps you have forgotten in the meantime. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to One America News Network. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jytdog (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating biographies of living or recently deceased people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information on edit warring and the three-revert rule

Your recent editing history shows that you are approaching what Wikipedia calls an edit war. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not alter direct quotations, as you did in this edit. This is considered vandalism. Thank you. XOR'easter (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter Biden. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]