User talk:Binip

COI Disclosure and Request for Review of Draft Article: A to Z Dispatch

COI Disclosure and Draft Purpose

Hello! My name is Sunil Shrestha, and I’m affiliated with A to Z Dispatch. I’ve created this draft article to provide neutral, verifiable, and well-sourced information about the company. I welcome review and editing from experienced Wikipedians to help improve the content and ensure it adheres to all Wikipedia policies.

I’ve disclosed my conflict of interest on my user page and will follow Wikipedia’s editing guidelines strictly.

Thank you! Binip (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A to Z Dispatch (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A to Z Dispatch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Binip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A to Z Dispatch (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases by the company are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A to Z Dispatch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft review

You can use Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submitting to submit your draft, but will almost certainly be declined because the only sources are copies of a press release, which is not an independent source. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:London Driving Academy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:London Driving Academy. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]