User talk:Binary0101

June 2021

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binary0101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet and was banned under false pretext. Binary0101 (talk) 13:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC) In particular, the charge was that I had stated "I AM A SOCKPUPPET PEOPLE!!!!!!!"[1] but I have of course never stated such a thing, as can be seen by the lack of any diffs being provided as evidence. Or as can be seen by that I don't write in all caps.Binary0101 (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I believe the blocking admin made the correct call here. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 11:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MPSCL is an oddly specific place to start off editing. What brought you there? ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 23:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

As I have already explained step-by-step in my response to the allegation in question I 1) was reading the Wikipedia article "Azov Battallion" to cross-check some information, after the article in question did not provide any relevant information I was looking for, I 2) went to check the Talk Page of "Azov Battallion" where I found a current RfC where people were referred to the SPI in question by user My Very Best Wishes.Binary0101 (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

You have explained no such thing on this page. By putting the unblock template on this page, you've asked uninvolved administrators to come by and take a look. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 00:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

I have never claimed I explained such thing on this page either, I simply assumed that "come by and take a look" included having taken a look at the SPI in question for which the unblock request is made. Am I correct in assuming that the evidence for this block consists of the allegations made there, such as the following?Binary0101 (talk) 00:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

OK - since it appears that I'm wasting your time by asking relevant questions, I'll move on to other things. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 00:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You asked a question and I answered, as well as provided a diff to an earlier answer in the SPI that got me blocked in the first place. I then also asked a relevant question but you gave no answer, you merely declared to "move on to other things." And n as much as we could determine these "appearances" of whether a user considers it a waste of their time in being asked relevant questions, a good indicator seems to be whether they actually take the time to respond to such questions or not - making your claim about "appearances" false. The only one who "appears" to consider it a waste of their time being asked relevant questions is you, given that you are the only one not willing to take the time answering them.Binary0101 (talk) 01:16, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk page access removed

Due to persistent misuse, I have removed your talk page access. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)