User talk:Bayfone
Archive.org links
[edit]Why are you doing a wholesale removal of archive.org links? The links allow access even when the original link is inaccessible. If the link is not dead there is still usually no reason to remove the archive.org link - it can and should be preserved as an alternative so that the link will still be available if/when the original link becomes unavailable. Removing them doesn't seem helpful, unless I'm missing some logic in your actions. See Help:Using the Wayback Machine -- Begoon 08:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Please stop these removals until you've responded to this message and clarified your reasons. Thank you. -- Begoon 08:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Page (fighter) with this
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Casey (fighter). Begoon 05:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Since you have offered no explanation for your destructive removals, they will be treated as vandalism and your account will be blocked from editing if you continue. There will be no more warnings. -- Begoon 05:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Noticeboard notification
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Persistent removal of content - rejected at AIV, so bringing here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You need to stop removing links to archive.org or other archival websites. We keep these in case the original page becomes inaccessible for any reason. Even if the page is currently not inaccessible, we want to have the archive.org link there now. Please do not remove such links again. —Kusma (t·c) 16:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)