User talk:Bashargold

December 2019

Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tiger I have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 23:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Panzer IV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Panzer IV, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 14:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 10.5 cm leFH 18. Denniss (talk) 20:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 06:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bashargold, I am concerned about many of your recent edits. For example, in Naval history of World War II, you've repeatedly edited a table of warship production to change the number of battleships produced by Japan during the war from 2 to 12. Is it possible you are confusing peak battleship strength for total wartime production? There are other articles where you have introduced numbers without a source and sometimes in contradiction to existing sources. If you are editing in good faith, you may wish to review wp:Verifiability and to give more explanation of your changes in your edit summary and possibly the article talk pages. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at MG 08, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 11:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]