User talk:Basedchamar

correction on page - List of Jatav

you've currently removed some persons from list of jatav by saying - Both jatavs and chamars(Ravidassia/Ramdasia) are different communities as per High Court of India's statement in 1961. And all these notable people's belongs to Chamar(Ravidassia/Ramdasia) not to jatav community. but jatav is also a sub caste of chamar caste we ahirwar, ramdasia, ravidassia, etc. are the branches of chamar caste we are the follower of babasahab and guru ravidas instead of removing we can change the page name from list of jatav to list of chamars MY Gohad (talk) 06:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, both the communities are different not same.

The word jatav came from Jat/Jatya/Jatia/Jatu/Jatwa/Jatlan means camel headers.

Jatavs have their own history and chamars have their own. Basedchamar (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics: minimum 500 edits / extended confirmed right required for caste and related articles

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ekdalian (talk) 06:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indian military and caste topics require ECP

As noted in the message above,[1] you need to first become WP:ECP (500 edits) editor before editing about Indian military and caste. Failure to abide by this requirement can get you blocked. THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 10:27, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Staying Single When, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ottoman Tunisia, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 19:56, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Paul Emmons. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:OVERLINK CodeTalker (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Jorinde Voigt

added a link pointing to Algorithmic

Rudolf Kern

added a link pointing to Article

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jorinde Voigt

added a link pointing to Algorithmic

Pantsuit Politics

added a link pointing to Republican

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation changes

Why are you making all these punctuation changes? Most of them are incorrect, introducing grammatical errors into text that was perfectly fine. Please don't make punctuation changes unless there are errors in the existing text. If your English fluency is not adequate to determine whether punctuation is correct or not, just leave the text alone. CodeTalker (talk) 17:00, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David A. Jaffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Composition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]