This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ballofstring. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
A tag has been placed on Home Brew Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
Hello, Ballofstring. You have new messages at Talk:Home Brew Crew. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, I'm Mediran. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Minister of Housing (New Zealand) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Medirantalk to me!09:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Unity Books for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
moved back to national politics by joining the [[ACT New Zealand]] Party. He stood in the [[Epsom (New Zealand electorate| Epsom electorate]] and was elected as the sole MP for the party in 2011.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Orphaned non-free image File:Internet Party NZ logo.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Internet Party NZ logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Ballofstring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Wipsenade (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hello! Ballofstring,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Graham McCready (accountant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
I got it from the publishers website :) Yeah I'll keep an eye on it. It seems strange that they seem to know quite a bit about wikipedia policy but don't have an account? Maybe they're trying to cover their tracks for whatever reason... --Ballofstring (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Do you know if this anonymous editor qualify the page for semi-protection - or does it need be disruptively edited by more than one person? -- Ballofstring (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ballofstring - the article looks good, but needs more references and probably a section outlining the historic background at the start would be good. Cheers. NealeFamily (talk) 23:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for having a look at it. Yeah I'm going to keep working on it - I thought I would just plonk a whole lot of material from elsewhere and then just refine it over time :) – Ballofstring (talk) 23:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheCivilianParty.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:TheCivilianParty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slacktivism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
amp;amp;db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=43b1468ca301690</ref><ref>[http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0505451</ref>), the second planet to be detected in this way. In
Hi @Stuartyeates: thanks for the heads up about the email address – I've fixed it now. I got part way through reconfirming my email ages ago and typed in the wrong email and then forgot about it! I'll send you an email :-) — Ballofstring (talk) 06:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi @Stuartyeates: I sent you an email in reply - let me know if you didn't receive it! (Having trouble with my emails being marked as spam after switching providers...)
Hi again @Stuartyeates: I sent you another email - apparently we need to let the woman organising it quite urgently about who's coming on the two free tickets + dietary requirements etc. (Sorry for all these pings - I just want to make sure you get my messages...) Ballofstring (talk) 21:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jamie Whyte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Seymour. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Robert Chapman (academic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
Moving named references back in source text is "tidying up"?
Hi, I noticed you made several edits to Evolution (software) which moved the named references from the "References" section back into the text body. Back when I worked on this article I made a conscious decision to use named references in the "References" section because it makes the text body source easier to read. This is supported by WP:LDRHOW. Right now the text body source is a mess again because the very long references make it difficult to read. Most importantly, the policy WP:CITESTYLE forbids moving over the citation style without seeking consensus first. So I'll undo your changes to the citation style, but keep your other changes intact. --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 08:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi @AlexanderVanLoon:! Thanks for leaving me a message. I wasn't really aware that listing the references in the reflist was a legitimate way of doing references, as I've only ever seen it done in a couple of articles (and just assumed it was a eccentric style). So thanks for linking that WP policy! I'm definitely of the view that having references in the text makes much more sense, but I do understand where you're coming from. Undoing my changes sounds good. Sorry for coming in and changing the style without consulting everyone. I'll be more careful in the future :-) Ballofstring (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ballofstring, regarding this edit, I thought I'd point out that there should never be a redlink when you link to a former member of parliament from either the upper (Legislative Council) or lower house (House of Representatives), respectively. Every politician that we've ever had at the central government level has a page, so you should always achieve a functioning link. Schwede6608:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66:! Thanks for the letting me know. I don't think I was aware that every former parliamentary politician had a page. I'll try and be more conscientious in the future :-) Cheers Ballofstring (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Ballofstring. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Toby Manhire, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
Hi @Smirkybec: you're probably right about the notability of that article. I've tried to find sources but came up with a whole lot of things written by him but not about him. Could moving it back to a draft be a compromise? Cheers Ballofstring (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
If I may chip in - moving to draft would work if you think that you will find other sources (offline, I presume) at some stage. I think articles can be kept in the draft area for up to half a year. I guess what that means is that if Manhire just isn't notable, then it's not a solutions either. Schwede6600:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Uber regulation summary: help needed
Hi Ballofstring, I'm reaching out to each of the editors who commented on the "Request for Comment" at Talk:Uber (company) re: the Uber article's section on regulation and legal issues. As you might remember, editors were overwhelmingly in favor of splitting off that information into a new article, then summarizing in the Uber article. While the first part happened, there has been no movement on the summarizing and Regulatory opposition continues to grow and grow. To help kickstart that process, I've put forward a draft for everyone to take a look at that aims to cover the key details in a summary form: Summarizing Regulatory opposition
My conflict of interest means that it's best for me not to be bold and move this into the article myself, but I hope that it can at least be a starting point for other editors to work from. Would you mind coming back to the page to have a look? Craig at Uber (talk) 19:49, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, good work. If you do nominate it for DYK, note that it's currently not long enough; they require 1500 bytes of prose (and that excludes quotations). Schwede6609:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you both! I've always thought it was a very beautiful building and was surprised it didn't have a wiki page already! I'll do a bit more expanding and then have a think about DYK. Cheers! Ballofstring (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
It is a stunning building all right! But to avoid potential DYK disappointment, articles have to be nominated within seven days of having been created. That's today or tomorrow, so don't think about it for too long. Schwede6618:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I am working on the russian version "Burnside High School" article, which currently has short history section in wikipedia. I am writing you to ask - is there a possibility for you to visit a National Library at Welligton and obtain an electronic copy of book "Choosing the right path : Burnside High School 1960-2010 / Paul O'Connor" (http://natlib.govt.nz/records/21643829), and put some information into the article? Also I can buy a hard copy of that book. Could you give me an advice, if it's possible? I'll be happy to get any version and any part of that book.
Thank you for your time, --Voyagerim (talk) 13:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thanks very much for fixing that quote. it's been bugging me ever since I added it (and haven't got back to fix it.) Elucidata (talk) 07:32, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antrim House, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antrim and William Turnbull. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Universal service may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
. The language of "universal service" has also been used in proposals by the US [[Democratic Party (United States|Democratic Party]] for the reform of health care.
Hi there. I'm organising an edit-a-thon at Te Papa on Sunday May 29th, focussed on adding NZ flora and fauna species to Wikipedia. It would be good to have some more experienced editors along to help any complete beginners, and I wonder if you might be interested in attending. If so, feel free to add yourself to the Wikipedia:Meetup/Wellington/2016_Edit-a-thon. It would be great to have a good turnout and show Te Papa there's an active local editing community. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Ambrosia10:@Giantflightlessbirds: thanks for your message and for organising the edit-a-thon. It was a great event and really nice to meet some fellow editors. Apologies I couldn't stay for much of the afternoon, and yes I will hopefully see you at another event sometime soon! Ballofstring (talk) 03:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I'm about to start some social-justice related editing, and I'm finding quite a few usable images on commons that you've uploaded.
Hello, Ballofstring. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Ballofstring. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Waitangi Tribunal logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thank you for all your help working with new users during the Women in Science workshop – it made a big difference to the day, and several participants commented on how great it was to have experienced editors to help them. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 10:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ballofstring. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocket Lab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Beck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Thanks for uploading File:Privacy Commissioner NZ logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Ballofstring. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for your contribution! It's not clear to me from the article whether the topic meets WP:NPROF (or maybe WP:NBIO is more appropriate here?). So if there are other sources/material out there that you could add to make it clear that she passes those guidelines, that might save you and other editors some time down the road. Happy editing!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and pingme. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
Hello, I'm Mediran. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Minister of Housing (New Zealand) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mediran talk to me! 09:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
