User talk:Axios512

Welcome!

Hi Axios512! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 17:47, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bluing red links

Please stop creating redirects like Siege of Damietta (1799). It is not ambiguous and should not point to a disambiguation page. Or like Hugh II Embriaco. That link should remain red so long as Hugh is notable enough for an article. Srnec (talk) 00:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Srnec: Nothing bad happened! You can still remove the redirect by writing about those topics, start a stub then others can expand! Axios512 (talk) 11:23, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But now I do not even know there is no article unless I actually click the link! There is nothing wrong with red links. Srnec (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated the Mazyadid redirects for deletion. Srnec (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, something bad happened. Before, there was a red link so a reader who was interested in the topic knew that we needed an article on it. Now there is a blue link that deceptively points to a disambiguation page. On top of that, there are now two links on the disambiguation page that point back to the same disambiguation page, taking readers in an infinite loop. Please delete both the 1732 and 1799 redirects! --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:20, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]