User talk:Asdffdsaasdffdsaasdffdsa

November 2015

Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan (talk) 02:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Regulation of electronic cigarettes. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Regulation of electronic cigarettes was changed by Asdffdsaasdffdsaasdffdsa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965794 on 2015-11-30T02:41:14+00:00 .

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Uganda. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library. You have vandalised Wikipedia one too many times. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you can expect to be blocked. Thank you. BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 02:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]