User talk:Arpmuswikicontrib

This is Arpmuswikicontrib's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Arpmuswikicontrib, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Arpmuswikicontrib! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ‎ Plays88keys (talk) 06:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013 cond.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Arpmuswikicontrib", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Stalwart111 04:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I chose that name only because I want to support the company work, as some other users of the products do from number of years. Reading in another place that you do not find "anything in the product that makes it notable", I am sure that you did absolutely not test the demo ! I invite you to do so : http://www.arpegemusic.com/demo1.htm and to come back after, not to (pre)judge my work, but to help me to find how to write my article better in a more encyclopedical style. It is my first work. In the contributors rules, there are "don't byte newbies !" and that is exactly what you do (having yourself written an article for a company which looks very commercial too). Thank you to test the product and show in which way you are a music software specialist. If I do not quote a lot works written by university teachers, it is that the software is not supported by a lot of financial interests and I quote the only references I find. And actually the ones I found are published on .com websites but include technical analysis and present how to master the program, so these are not bad references. Arpmuswikicontrib

I left you that note as a courtesy but your username violation wasn't reported by me. There are very clear inclusion criteria and you should have a read of them before trying to use Wikipedia to promote your product. WP:BITE is aimed at encouraging experienced editors to welcome new legitimate editors, not promo-spammers. Please read WP:NOTHERE. Stalwart111 09:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Stalwart111 10:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and edit warfare. You are clearly not here to help build an encyclopaedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 11:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being blocked does not mean you can just log out and carry on edit warring as an anonymous IP, repeatedly removing the AfD tag again, so I have protected the article and the AfD discussion so you cannot edit them. If you want to take part in the discussion, you need to make a successful unblock request here first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]