2008

370Z

Please read this about unannounced vehicles. roguegeek (talk·cont) 07:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone knows this vehicle is coming out, but everything on that page you created is from media speculation and nothing more. Let's wait until October 29 when the vehicle is formally introduced by Nissan. roguegeek (talk·cont) 07:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright, thanks for letting me know. As soon as it gets officially announced by Nissan I'll recreate the page with whatever updated information there might be. Andrew Nutter (talk) 08:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also real quick, it's ok to have this test page, but fair use images can only be used in article namespace. I have removed the fair use images from your test article again. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. roguegeek (talk·cont) 08:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind, I'd like to help you work on that test page to get it ready for announcement. I'm going to also throw a link to it on the discussion page of the actual article. roguegeek (talk·cont) 08:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, definitely. I'm sure you have more experience working on articles than I do anyway. Andrew Nutter (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Nissan 370Z interior.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Nissan 370Z interior.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unfree image, not used on any articles, and massive visual watermark.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Nissan 370Z interior.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. roguegeek (talk·cont) 07:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

aiv

Hello Andrew. I'm confused by these two edits: [1], [2]. I assume it was a messed up script? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 02:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I am assuming you are not referring to my report of the vandalism, but the things above that? I have no clue why it did that, I just added things to the bottom. Andrew Nutter Talk | Contribs 02:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorbitol Pathway

Did you cross-post at WT:MCB? --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Struggle

A tag has been placed on Struggle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009

Fez (That '70s Show)

Please note that I have found and added sources to support the idea that the character is named "Fez" (even though that does not match the acronym for "foreign exchange student" exactly), and moved the page back accordingly. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello since you are interested in ancient warfare , i would like to ask you if you would like to contribute here Dacian warfare.Thankou.Megistias (talk) 19:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2012

Assume Good Faith

I resent being called a vandal on my talk page for adding statistical information 66.87.0.99 (talk) 23:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013

Global warming conspiracy theory

Hi Andrew Nutter, once someone has reverted one's edits, it is time to discuss them. No sense getting into an edit war. I viewed your re-write as not neutral, leaning towards the conspiracy theorists. And I notice another editor does as well. On the talk article page you can explain your position better. I agree that the article is not in good shape. Cheers--I am One of Many (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew Nutter. I mentioned your name (after first making a mistake about who said what) on the talk page of Global warming conspiracy theory, claiming that on May 21 you supported getting rid of a phrase "Despite ... consensus" in the background section. Hope I got it right this time.Peter Gulutzan (talk) 23:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]