User talk:Andrea.galupo2015

Welcome!

Hello, Andrea.galupo2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:ATC Healthcare International Corporation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! /wia /talk 01:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Andrea.galupo2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ATC Healthcare International Corporation". The reason given for ATC Healthcare International Corporation's block is: "{{uw-

Blocking administrator: Smalljim (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Your previous account was blocked not just for its username (which would on its own have been a reason for the block) but also for its utterly promotional edits. Wikipedia is not free ad space. Your current account has continued in exactly the same manner; consequently I'll block this account, too. Creating any further accounts would be considered block evasion. Huon (talk) 01:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in User:Andrea.galupo2015/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page User:Andrea.galupo2015/sandbox, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Further comments

The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ...which offers a complete line of dietary food supplements and other healthcare products... answering the needs of all ages... grown into one of the most innovative healthcare developers in the country... It is a emerging leading company... employs advanced technology and carries out strict internal control standards to deliver only high-quality products... thus, assuring every consumer that what they are taking is actually taking care of their health.—there is no factual, non-spammy content at all
giving contact information is also unencyclopaedic and spammy
it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
You should not edit on behalf of any organisation, particularly if you work for that company or have any other undeclared financial interest in promoting it

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]