User talk:Anastrophe/Archive 2006

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Anastrophe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

The vertical and horizontal axes are both exactly the same on all three graphs. The only people who accuse me of lying are those in deep denial about the relation between radiative forcing and the strength of storms. Greater atmospheric energy means increases in storm strength and average windspeed. The tortured and pathetic arguments of those who deny the obvious connection remind me of the antiheliocentrics against Copernicus. —James S. 04:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

both exactly the same? you're kidding, right?

first graph, vertical axis, billions 2001 US dollars, 0, 200, 400, 600, 800
second graph, vertical axis,billions 2001 US dollars, 0, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
third graph, vertical axis, billions 2001 US dollars, 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300

that's the most peculiar definition of 'exactly the same' i've run across. Anastrophe 04:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

I was referring to the units, not the labels. —James S. 05:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

RfC opened for Mr j galt

An RfC has been opened here against User:Mr j galt (talk • contribs). If you are familar with his editing and would like to add your input, please feel free to do so, whatever your POV. Thanks! -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

(the following was left on my user page rather than the discussion page.)

Mengele

You could've at least left the part about the sexual revolution in. "Pre-anticipated" is more of a redundancy than... Multifauceted 21:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)