User talk:Amitkumar9918

Welcome!

Hello, Amitkumar9918, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article (or draft of an article) about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:52, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Amitkumar9918

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Amitkumar9918, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not repost promotional content on Wikipedia. New users can be forgiven for doing this initially, but users who continue to post promotional content after being told about Wikipedia's policy against promotion will be shown less leniency. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Amitkumar9918/Sample page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Amitkumar9918/Sample page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 16:28, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amitkumar9918 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest, advertising, and notability guidelines. I acknowledge that I should not have created or edited biographical content related to a client or political subject. I confirm that I will not engage in promotional or paid editing, and I will not recreate the article in mainspace. If unblocked, I will limit my contributions to neutral, non-controversial areas and will follow the Articles for Creation process only, with independent reliable sources. I respectfully request reconsideration of this block. Thank you for your time.

Decline reason:

Show that YOU understand, not that an AI tool understands. Appeal in your own words. Cabayi (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Amitkumar9918 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were promotional in nature. I apologize for this mistake. I will follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view and conflict of interest guidelines in future and will not use Wikipedia for promotion. I request reconsideration of my block. Thank you.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that my previous edits were promotional in nature. I apologize for this mistake. I will follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view and conflict of interest guidelines in future and will not use Wikipedia for promotion. I request reconsideration of my block. Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my previous edits were promotional in nature. I apologize for this mistake. I will follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view and conflict of interest guidelines in future and will not use Wikipedia for promotion. I request reconsideration of my block. Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my previous edits were promotional in nature. I apologize for this mistake. I will follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view and conflict of interest guidelines in future and will not use Wikipedia for promotion. I request reconsideration of my block. Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Are you Amit Kumar, or are you his representative? 331dot (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Hi there! To help us respond to the request, please do the following:[reply]

Review Wikipedia's payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked.
Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.

Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amitkumar9918 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I understand that my previous edits may have violated Wikipedia's guidelines, particularly regarding autobiography or conflict of interest. That was not my intention. I sincerely apologize for the mistake. I have now reviewed Wikipedia's policies and understand the importance of neutral and independent sourcing. I assure you that future contributions will strictly follow Wikipedia's content and notability guidelines. I kindly request reconsideration of the block. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". The Reply function is imperfect and does not work well in all situations, such as posting at the bottom. I'm still looking for an answer to my question. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]