User talk:Alieldear

I am a signed user, and did nothing wrong!!!

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Alieldear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

41.224.221.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ClemClem32". The reason given for ClemClem32's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is a blatant violation of our username policy - it is obviously profane, attacks or impersonates another person, or clearly suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and trolling or other disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. ".

Blocking administrator: Ultraexactzz (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Clearly part of the sockpuppetry, you have now been blocked directly. — Yamla (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|1=41.224.221.123|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ClemClem32". The reason given for ClemClem32's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is a blatant violation of our username policy - it is obviously profane, attacks or impersonates another person, or clearly suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and trolling or other disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. ".|3=Ultraexactzz|4=804338}} --Alieldear (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alieldear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a signed user, and did nothing wrong--Alieldear (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious sockpuppet. - auburnpilot talk 22:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.