User talk:Akcent2007

Kylie

Hey there! You've recently repeatedly reverted the peak position of "Kylie" on the Romanian Top 100 to No.1. This is unsourced, however, and Wikipedia is based on sources. "Kylie" may have very well been a No.1, however, there are no sources to back this up. The only archives available on the internet regarding the No.1s on the Romanian Top 100 are stored here; as neither "Kylie" or "Dragoste de închiriat" appear on this list, it means there is no evidence that they reached No.1. The only position available is No.2. Thank you for understanding. Please stop reverting or else I will sadly have to report you. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You say you originate from Romania you should know this better than anyone Kylie was their breakthrough song and it was number 1 in Romania that's what made the band popular.Please make a distinguishment between Dragoste de inchiriat and Kylie,the latter did peak at no.1 i remember the charts from 2005,but sadly it cannot be recovered as it was a long time ago so you will have to take my word on it.Thanks for understanding and don't contact me again. Akcent2007 (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We only take the Romanian Top 100 into consideration when we talk about Romanian charts pre-2012. All its complete archives are stored here, and the song was not a number one there, you can check the list yourself, so your argument is completely invalid. And also just by the way... what makes a no.2-single not a breakthrough single?? You're probably remembering another chart which wasn't the Romanian Top 100. I have sadly reported you. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is even a Jurnalul source which talks about the song being stuck at number 2 here: "Trebuie sa mentionez ca mult elogiata "Kylie" a stat cinci saptamani pe pozitia secunda in clasamentul nostru, neprimind in toata aceasta perioada numarul de difuzari necesar pentru a putea urca acea ultima pozitie." Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. It seems that you are refusing to understand that Kylie never reached number one, when we even added a jurnalul.ro article which clearly states that Jokero was the group's first number one. Wikipedia is rather factual (i.e. everything needs to be backed by sources) than anecdotal (i.e. taking someone's word for it) so unless you have a reliable citation which proves that Kylie actually peaked at one, please stop reverting our edits. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Akcent2007: you seem to be quite adamant about the fact that "Kylie" reached number one but you keep ignoring us. Unfortunately the peak position of #1 cannot be kept in the article as Wikipedia relies on sources, which you refuse to provide. We have already provided sources which show that Kylie never hit number one but you're ignoring those as well. Sebbirrrr (talk) 09:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, and for edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]