User talk:AjayTyagi1

Welcome!

Hello, AjayTyagi1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article (or draft of an article) about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 12:17, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Tyagi (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Tyagi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AjayTyagi1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Tyagi (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft was resubmitted unchanged. Please fix the problem before resubmitting the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Tyagi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Tyagi has been accepted

Ajay Tyagi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:33, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ajay Tyagi

Hi AjayTyagi1! I can see that you've tried to copy your article back to Draft:Ajay Tyagi. You don't need to do this — an AfC reviewer has accepted the draft, and it now exists as an article at Ajay Tyagi. Given that the article has now been published, Draft:Ajay Tyagi just exists as a redirect to the published article. If you would like to make further changes to the article, you can edit Ajay Tyagi directly, or you can ideally make edit requests on the article's talk page. Just let me know if that is at all unclear, and happy editing! MCE89 (talk) 07:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I saw your edit summary This draft is about a DIFFERENT person. This is Ajay Tyagi the ROWER (Athlete), NOT the SEBI Chairman. I think you may be confused — your draft has been accepted, and exists at Ajay Tyagi. That page was created by you and is about the rower. You do not need to continue resubmitting your draft — it has already been accepted. MCE89 (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Tyagi (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ajay Tyagi instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Tyagi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Tyagi (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ajay Tyagi instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, your draft has already been accepted and exists at Ajay Tyagi. Please edit it there instead of continuing to submit this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Tyagi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Tyagi (November 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Wikishovel was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Enough of this. Ajay Tyagi is about the rower, born 2000, from Sara village. So is this one. Stop wasting reviewers' time.

Wikishovel (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ajay Tyagi, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]