User talk:AgainstDefamationAlb

April 2025

Wikipedia policy is to present subjects as they are shown in independent third party reliable sources. We do not seek to present organisations in the way that they themselves prefer to be presented; that is for their own websites or other publicity methods to do. Please don't remove cited independent coverage of a topic and replace it with material promoting an organisation's preferred view, as you did at Albanian Third Position. JBW (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JBW, I noticed your recent edits to the Albanian Third Position page and wanted to kindly discuss them. While I appreciate your contributions to the wiki, some of the changes you’ve made appear to contain inaccuracies or unsourced information. Specifically, the information I reverted. To maintain the wiki’s reliability, it’s important that all information is backed by credible references. If you have verifiable sources supporting your edits, please share them so we can integrate the content accurately. Otherwise, I’ll need to revert the changes to align with the wiki’s sourcing guidelines. Let me know if you’d like help finding reliable references or discussing this further. Thanks for your understanding and cooperation! AgainstDefamationAlb (talk) 21:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JBW,

One of the many issues with this wiki page is that the "Hooliganism" section is entirely false and misleading. The ideology attributed to these groups has no legitimate connection to sports or fan culture.

Albania has never had ideologies or state-sponsored movements aligned with such extremist beliefs. The group in question is solely rooted in nationalism and has no political agenda—it simply promotes a cultural identity and way of life, not extremist ideologies.

I urge you to either revise the section with verifiable sources or remove it entirely, as it currently spreads misinformation. If necessary, I can provide sources or further clarification to correct the record.

I also sent this message to another editor of this wiki page, I wont be reverting anymore the page but I look forward for a reply to this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. AgainstDefamationAlb (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]